The court gives an exceptional interlocutory injunction on such claims in cases where the applicant or the institution has a very high risk of serious harm. Such precautionary decisions are then communicated to the Government responsible for the violation. The decision made for the process up to the final decision in order to prevent situations such as difficulty in obtaining the right due to prolonged judicial activities, damage due to delay, and it becomes impossible to obtain the right is called an interlocutory injunction. In order for the injunction decision to be made, the court must be convinced of this.
Why is interlocutory injunction taken?
No distinction has been made in the law in terms of the rights that are or are not covered by the injunction, and no restriction has been made in terms of these rights. However, if we make a general assessment in the light of concrete events, the right that is most desirable to be protected in this context is the right of ownership. In addition, in cases filed against the decisions of legal entities taken at the general assembly or the board of directors, the institution of injunctive relief may also be applied for. As explained, there is no limitation on the injunction.
What is your reaction to this?